Do they have a separate judge to see that the penalty is applied correctly ?
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Dave Marles |
Stop n Go |
Lead | |
|
Anyone besides Erich Costa thinks this is a good rule ? I see that the rule has been amended so that you must bring in your boat on the lap that the warning
is issued. That is a nightmare given the confusion that usually exists between judges and pit assistants. This could mean the driver is disqualified because
the pit assistant did not understand the warning. Why on the same lap? There is no reason at all for that. These things need to be thought through more
carefully. What happens if a penalty is given to the wrong boat ( it happens )? No chance for the driver to have things corrected.
Do they have a separate judge to see that the penalty is applied correctly ?
Dave
Tuning software |
|||
Bart Drieghe |
|||
|
This has been amended on the WC in Leno so i'm afraid that you are a bit late on this Dave .
Secondly , nowhere in the text does it say you have to stop in the same lap , nowhere so ......... Neither does it say how long the stop is ......... I'm personally against this rule because i don't think this will help plus its very vague , is there a time to be actually stop ? I'm convinced that someone who exercises on it can do a stop and go within 10 seconds , even 5 should be possible i think coming in , boat on the stand , engine off , belt ready , restart and there you go . Where is the punishment then ? Btw , this is the text from the naviga meeting in leno This is a text from the NAVIGA minutes of Leno The current safety rule is issuing a yellow card for breaches of safety rules. This does not seem to be working very well because there are problems with recording who was given yellow card in one heat and carried it thorough to the next. It creates additional administration for the judges. Peter Schaft has put forward a proposal that the yellow safety card is replaced with " stop and go " penalty. This would mean that if a judge has issued a competitor with a stop and go penalty they would have to bring the boat back to the pontoon, turn off the engine and start again to continue the race. Stop and go penalty would be given for the following situations: FSR -V - passing the rescue boat or the pontoon too close and too fast FSR - O - passing the pontoon too close too fast FSR - H - passing the pontoon too close too fast will mean an extra lap to complete the race. Ian Folkson, clarified the problem in noting the yellow card because it is meant to be carried over from 1st heat into the next. Alternative "stop go" penalty is immediate, does not carry over to next heat. It will make the race safer, yellow card / safety card is not being noted by competitors. France already uses this system. Steve Whenham suggested we need to also decide how many stop and go penalties will you be allowed in one heat? Otherwise you can continue to drive recklessly to make up the missed time. Australia was concerned about how does the judge measure the distance from pontoon or the rescue boat. Ian Folkson responded that judge needs to be consistent not necessarily accurate. France confirms it is a good system. It gives you an opportunity to calm down, discuss with judge etc. Luxemburg - safety for people in the rescue is most important the safety measures in place are not making it safer for them. Ian Folkson suggest that maybe if you have 2 stop and go penalties in the heat you should be out of that heat. Sweden - in respect of offshore racing even just 1 stop and go penalty will mean that you are out of the race, you will not qualify. Steve Whenham was concerned that whilst we all know about danger of the rescue boat and pits has anyone thought about the fact that the judge is not watching the race whilst he is issuing a penalty and they should each be given a runner to deliver the decision to competitor . USA - If you have 3 extra penalty laps you are out of the race. It does not matter how this is done but the judges should be consistent. Why not just keep it a penalty lap system and you remove the competitor after predetermined number of penalties. USA were concerned that you are creating other safety problems in the process of removing boat from the water and re-launching the boat because of stop go penalty. Ezio Casini pointed out that the life of the people in rescue boat is more important than the competitors race. Germany believe that in FSR-O one lap deduction is better than stop go penalty. For FSR-V v it would be applicable but for O it may be difficult. France there should be a time on stop go penalty. Competitor should be given time to think because you need to calm down before they are re-launching the boat. Some further discussion took place regarding within how many laps should the boat be brought in and that stop and go penalty cannot be appealed because it is immediate. The safety card could be formally appealed at the end. Discussion was closed and revised proposal was put forward for the vote: H - extra lap for safety rule breach, when 3rd penalty has been issued competitor will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat. O - lap deducted for safety rule breach, when 3rd penalty has been issued competitor will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat. V - stop and go penalty applies for safety rule breaches. Once competitor has been informed by the judge that they have received a stop and go penalty they will have to immediately bring the boat back to the pontoon, put it on the stand, stop the engine, restart and resume the competition. When the 3rd stop and go penalty has been issued to the same competitor they will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat. Above revised proposal was put forward by Ian Folkson and seconded by USA. Voting takes place Everyone present agreed to the rule change as above. I think we need a clarification of it because its very grey and not white and black B
|
|||
SOLLING |
|||
|
Something had to be done to stop the dangerous driving of a VERY small number of boaters, if this the correct way, time will tell, what concerns me ,is that
whilst the judge is talking to the drivers pit person, more offences can be committed and not picked up. HOW FAIR IS THAT.
I said in Leno that this was a rule that could lead to unfair decisions and I still stand by that. |
|||
w3bby |
|||
|
For those that don't know me I have administered most of the V racing in Sweden for the past few years and this year, for my sins, was voted in as the
chairman of the V-section in Sweden.
My view is that the rule is badly written, open to interpretaion, open to abuse and is a reaction to the inability of judges and race administrators to apply the old rule correctly, who says they will administer this one correctly? I queried the application of the rule with Peter Schaft as we start racing soon in Sweden. I was informed that the "Stop n' Go" is to be applied immediately and the boat is to come in on the completion of the lap the warning is received. I have also queried the stopping of the engine on the stand. My question is what happens if the boat dies on the water as it is brought in. As the rule is written my interpretation is that the boat has to be started, stopped on the stand and then restarted to rejoin the race. I have yet to recieve a reply on this point. As I stated on another forum if anything, safety wise, the rule should read "brought to the pontoon, stopped on the water, removed and placed on the stand, restarted and resume the race. Totally agree with Solling that the judges time should not be spent looking over someones shoulder to make sure the procedure is followed correctly....
_____________
Ian |
|||
Bart Drieghe |
|||
|
Actually Ian ,
The fact wether you have to come in on the same lap of the warning has not been written down . Sofar i have not seen any rule saying that so its up to the judge . What i hate even more is that we , FSR racers have NOT received any notice of this rule so how can we use this rule if nobody tells us . Another remark for you is , if i get my boat in and it still runs while i'm putting it on the stand , do i get a DQ because its still running ? I don't want to be picky or so but stopped on the water should be : STOPPED , ENGINE SHUT OFF . Nothing more , nothing less . Wether it is on the water or on the stand makes zero difference so ..... . As for the judges , it shouldn't be their job either to look if someone has missed a bouy or not , we could use other people to follow that up instead of judges . They should be busy checking if the racing is fair or not . Regards , B
|
|||
w3bby |
|||
|
Hi Bart
The badly written rule is why I asked for clarification of how it is to be implemented/interpreted. This is the reply I received from Peter: Hi Ian, in answer on your question,if the judge give the competitor one safety card he has to finish his lap and take out the boat immediately and not after two or three laps.If the engine fall out this is one problem for the competitor and not a judge problem.( point 6.1 (2) The stop and go penalty was working very well on the International in Stuttgart no problem at all. Best regards Peter As I have yet to see this in practice I do not know if there is a difference between stopped on the water or on the stand, the fact is, as written the routine is put it on the stand, stop the engine. This implies that the motor MUST be running when put on the stand. This is being picky about the wording but as this is now the rule the application must be the same at all races so that a. judges know how to implement the rule. b. competitors know what to expect.
_____________
Ian |
|||
gbeg1 |
|||
|
Phill, was disqualified in Stuttgart for this! I, as the mechanic, was shown a yellow card with no "words" from the judge. I assumed it was a warning
as did Phill. He continued to lap and then i was told he was disqualified for not bringing the boat in!
Regards,
|
|||
alan whitaker |
|||
|
Hi All.
I thought they were going to put a big S on the card, bit of a bummer for Philip. Alan |
|||
Dave Marles |
|||
|
Why on earth would you have to bring it on the same lap? Can someone answer this?
Obviously the system did not work perfectly in Stuttgart because someone was disqualified. Racers should not be disqualified for things like that. (in my opinion)
Dave
Tuning software |
|||
alan whitaker |
|||
|
Hi All. Well another unclear rule or should we just use plain common sense. I totally agree with Dave on this one, if you do as the rules say you have to bring your boat in on the lap you were given the stop and go, if you are on bottom left with 3 or 4 boats then you have not finished the lap but you would have to bring your boat in? Could be a nightmare if you are on the inside, do you cut over and risk a crash or slow down and risk a rear shunt, total confusion with no thought on implementing. The rule was a rush to solve a problem of drivers not slowing down for the rescue; if you wanted to stop this you could have just made the existing rule more severe i.e. do it once and your out. I think the debate of weather you engine is running or stopped is a bit OTT, most will kill the engine before lifting out of the water, I think lifting running boats out of the water is a accident waiting to happen, we all know the rush when we are racing you don't have time to look where the person next to you is and props are good at removing fingers and skin. One thing as Dave said you can be given a stop and go by mistake; the only way to make this fairer to the competitor is to have a team leader at every race to discuss with the officials the reason for and weather it is in fact a justified penalty, the way it is now will lead to arguments between competitors and judges / officials, if you have a stop and go it is the same weather you do it instantly or within 3 or 4 laps, I can see if you get one in the last few minutes it could create a bit of a problem. One thing if you are still giving out stop and goes, you still have the same problem of racers not slowing down for the rescue? Back to square one. I have seen drivers come in for a splash and dash and they are in and out in less than half a lap, so with practice you could only loose half a lap or less against the old 1 lap deduction. I think this rule need to be re- thought out, thank god we do not have to use this stupid rule in the UK, do clubs in Europe have to or are Naviga rules only a guidelines for non world championship events.
Alan |
|||
BoBoKwok |
|||
|
New mess every time when there is new rule.
Section meeting during World championship is too short to solve so many problems. Also very difficult for those who have to race. Careful thinking from a commitee with several knowledgeable people(Judges and top boaters) will be better than discussing these kind of business during WC. Not all team leader know technical detail very well. |
|||
SOLLING |
|||
|
OK lets get back to basics, this rule was brought in on safety grounds, it was thought that the existing rules were not a sufficient deterrent for dangerous
driving,I think you will all agree that the judges have a very hard and thankless job, who last went up to a judge and thanked him or her for judging their
race.
|
|||
w3bby |
|||
alan whitaker wrote:I totally agree Alan, replace one safety concern with another... So is it "spirit "of the rule or literal application? More time should be taken to prepare, discuss, write and finally present a workable solution. My solution, toughen the now replaced rule or just ensure that it is applied correctly in the first place.
_____________
Ian |
|||
alan whitaker |
Re The Re | ||
|
Hi Ian. In the past we had situations where at most races people would not slow down, one thing that we all saw was the number of times the P A person (man with microphone) would keep saying to slow down, there was times when they should have given a yellow card but did not just shouted slow down again and again, perhaps we should have enforced the existing rule we had, then we would not have a system that is going to cause all sorts of problems. I can see after race confrontations if someone is just out of the final, we all know when we are going to fast past the rescue and if you are not the person it is just bad luck when you have had a stop and go or even a DQ if you did not stop. Like all rules they are there to be changed to make it safe for the rescue and competitor alike, so how to make this better, we could vote to go back the old way and enforce it at least you can get the lap back if you make a protest, even have a video of the rescue when it leaves and comes back, I don't think the new system was thought out but rushed through. I did here that this rule was going to come weather we liked it or not, maybe there is someone who can shed some light on the thinking about this.
Another point from Bart's post.
France confirms it is a good system. It gives you an opportunity to calm down, discuss with judge etc. France there should be a time on stop go penalty. Competitor should be given time to think because you need to calm down before they are re-launching the boat. Time to calm down and do what discuss this with a judge; come on think about this? You put your boat on the stand and then go to discuss it with the judge, I don't think so, maybe tell him where to go ??.
Alan |
|||
gbnd7 |
Yellow cards | ||
|
As Alan has said the old rule could of had a stronger enforcement by the judges.
This new one will cause more problems than it will solve.What will happen if your boat stops on the water,is rescued and returned to the pits.Do you start the engine and stop it then restart it to rejoin the race. |
|||